25Sep/07
16 Signs it is Time to Impeach President Bush
There are a great many signs that our president needs to go. Some of them are metaphorical, some literal. Some are funny, though many are just sad. Here are 16 of the most compelling signs it is time to impeach GW, starting with the classics, then the serious ones, then the funny and finally the obvious:
Some you may not have seen yet:
Funny, sad and true:
The easiest and most obvious:
September 26th, 2007 - 02:26
Is it me, or have the American voters plucked the besotted,drug addled, semi-retarded son of a “royal” family and foisted him onto the world stage, so that he is free to exhibit every genetic mutation [found very often in convenient "royal"unions] to every nation. In order to wipe out any idea of our being a brave, free leader of the world. Well?
September 26th, 2007 - 07:15
Impeach -
1. To make an accusation against.
2. To charge (a public official) with improper conduct in office before a proper tribunal.
What charges do you intend to bring against Bush? Would it be taking the advice of the previous President Clinton or don’t you guys remember the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 that Clinton signed?
September 26th, 2007 - 15:52
ahh.. bad design/layout/coding
well, at least make sure the picture doesn’t get cut by your menu. The only way to view it on my laptop is to ‘view picture’
September 26th, 2007 - 22:31
Worst. President. Ever.
September 26th, 2007 - 22:44
These are great. There are some very serious reasons to impeach both Bush and Cheney. This administration has been eroding democracy ever since it stole the first election.
September 27th, 2007 - 06:40
Thank you very much for this site. It is a shame that the leader of the free world is a complete moron. But, you must ask the question, what does it say about our people, at least over half of them.
Thank you again.
September 27th, 2007 - 23:08
Well, let’s see about charges. You might want to check your history about Clinton. Clinton never wanted to go to War over this but Bush has used our money to kill Iraqi’s over what? Can you give me a good reason? I have yet to hear one. Never actually legally sanctioned by Congress. And also to kill American’s in a war, not over Terrorism or don’t you know that yet, no Al Qaeda there until we disrupted the place, no threat to the US or the immediate area, just a vendetta, obvious to anyone who really looks or really wants to see. Lies too numerous to count. The Republicans tried to impeach Clinton over a lie that was none of our business anyway, so there you go, people died because of Bush lying, good enough to impeach for me. The fact that you don’t see any reasons to impeach this guy makes me really wonder about your concept of right and wrong, are you under psychiatric care by any chance? (I am serious). Do you know the difference between right and wrong? fantasy and reality? Do you know what the word delusion or willful self delusion means?
September 28th, 2007 - 09:59
Why is it that every time we see protesters like this, it’s always a bunch of disheveled, freakish looking goons holding up impeachment signs? Do these people ever work? Do they have jobs or families they need to be raising?
Typical liberal nut cases… save a whale, kill a baby. Praise a dictator and call our troops terrorists.
September 28th, 2007 - 14:13
Mr. Impeach -
Here’s one impeachable offense for you. Sorry it doesn’t involve a blow job. President Bush has admitted he secretly ordered the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on Americans without ever seeking constitutionally-required court approved warrants. Under the program — authorized in the weeks following the 9/11 attacks — the agency has monitored the international phone calls and e-mails of hundreds — and possibly thousands — of people inside the country. That’s not opinion. It’s fact. President Bush admitted it in his interview on PBS’ NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, December 16, 2005.
But I’m sure that’s not enough for you. I doubt anything would be. No matter what, you’d just call it a simple mistake and say no harm was meant. Well, ignorance is not a defense under the law, at least not for you or I it isn’t. Cheers.
September 28th, 2007 - 15:14
Heh, I’m tickled pink that the Hell billboard found its way to you. Just to help foreigners out, Hell is a pizza company here in New Zealand. That was a real billboard and it made me smile.
Good pizza too.
September 28th, 2007 - 22:22
Impeach -
1. To make an accusation against.
2. To charge (a public official) with improper conduct in office before a proper tribuna
Negligent Homicide
Van Wagner & Wood, Criminal Defense Lawyers, Negligent Homicide Defense Attorneys
Negligent homicide is defined by Wisconsin law as a criminal offense that is committed by a person whose negligence is the direct cause of another person’s death. Negligence in law occurs when a person does not observe an obligation or duty where a legal obligation or duty exists or behaves in a manner lacking reasonable care. The law assumes that people will take a reasonable amount of care in all of their actions. Reasonable care is a degree of caution or care that a competent person in the same line of business, work, or activity should or is expected to exercise under similar circumstances. Negligence is then the lack of reasonable care and includes both actions with negligence and failure to act where a duty or obligation exists.
September 28th, 2007 - 22:28
Noun
* S: (n) criminal negligence, culpable negligence ((law) recklessly acting without reasonable caution and putting another person at risk of injury or death (or failing to do something with the same consequences))
October 2nd, 2007 - 09:59
how can anyone take this list seriously when the second image in, is an obvious fake.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/bushbook.asp
October 2nd, 2007 - 12:27
The real difference between Bush and Clinton that I can see is that when Clinton spoke, everyone wanted belived him, when Bush speaks, nobody wants to belive him. Fine, impeach Bush, but understand that if you kick him out, it will give a republican canidate the power of having been vice president for some time before the next election.
October 2nd, 2007 - 14:04
URetard,
First, I would like to comment on your extreme immaturity. This site, now full of comments from liberals, has not once insulted conservatives beyond the president. You, however, have taken it upon yourself to call us “nut cases” and “retards”. Huh, that’s respectful. Also, I happen to be a protester from a well off family. My dad, also a liberal, was the a CEO in two companies. So I would prefer you to keep your insults and your stereotypes to yourself and try adding an intelligent comment supporting your side.
Honestly, if I were the president, I would find it offensive that instead of supporting him, you wasted a comment with slander and disrespect.
October 2nd, 2007 - 20:21
Ok, seriously. How can some of these people say “War is how Americans learn geography?” I mean for God’s sakes, the person holding up the sign is insulting himself! I don’t know about everyone else, but I don’t make glaring generalizations about my country as whole based upon my specific opinion on our president. Also, THE MILITARY IS STRICTLY VOLUNTARY! Negligent Homicide applies when the death is a result out of their control. Bush does not throw the soldiers into Iraq, they sign up on their own accord. Maybe we would have a better democracy if people looked at all sides of the issue instead of choosing an extreme and never compromising!
October 3rd, 2007 - 05:38
BDS (that’s Bush Derangement Syndrome) is rampant here. Let’s elect Shrill-Hill and see how soon the Islamic atrocities manifest themselves here. What atrocities? Go read Michael Yon. Islam is NOT the religion of peace. The religion of pieces, perhaps, but not peace. We are at war with bestial, depraved psychopaths and you people want to have a 60′s style love-in. Sheep before the slaughter, you are.
October 3rd, 2007 - 15:35
I’m so tired of people mocking our president, things could be a hell of a lot worse in this country. Americans need to think about how lucky they are that they are not dead right now. You people think these terrorist are ever gunna stop? if we pull out troops now who knows the mayhem that will ensue. I’m not saying bush is a great president, I think we all know he has his flaws but I’m just saying that we should respect the person who is keeping our asses alive right now and that so happens to be him. thanks. k bye.
October 4th, 2007 - 00:55
Charges: International terrorism, as defined by the US Patriot Act~ A Terrorist Act is one that would “appear to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population, (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion, or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping”
Isn’t that what happened in Iraq?
October 6th, 2007 - 17:22
Kscweet: take a look at U.S. foreign policy. When countries near us try to get out from under our economic domination, we send CIA members out to threaten to blow them up. Don’t believe me? Read a book called DIARY OF AN ECONOMIC HITMAN. We killed as many people invading Panama – like, with tanks – as were killed in the WTC attax. Bush isn’t keeping us alive – he’s making sure people want to blow us up even more than they already do.
October 13th, 2007 - 10:05
Has anyone heard of Margie Schoedinger? Bush had her murdered after raping her. Don’t believe me? Google the name.
October 13th, 2007 - 10:36
Hahahaha – though I don’t particularly prescribe to these beliefs, I did find the “give Bush a BJ” sign quite amusing. By the way, Clinton was not impeached for getting a bj while in office – he was impeached for perjury by misleading a Federal grand jury about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky and for coercing others to lie in order to conceal his affair with Lewinsky.
October 13th, 2007 - 11:35
To the moron who “defined” impeach and requested what charges will be brought against Bush, and to all the other morons out there continuing to pursue that party line: IMPEACHMENT IS A POLITICAL PROCESS, NOT A CRIMINAL ONE.
Idiot.
October 13th, 2007 - 14:09
Is it not amazing that dumb conservitives always like to blame liberals and democrats for stuff there party president does
Let me guess when we were the biggest surplus that this country has ever seen near the end of Clinton’s second term that was Bush sr. doing? and now that we are in the largest deficit near the end of Bush jr. second term in office its all the fault of Clinton? all he did was pot and have an affair
its not like he was a cocaine addict and alcoholic
October 13th, 2007 - 14:14
For the majority of foreigners (Europeans) it has always been clear that Bush doesn’t only have “little flaws” but is in no way a serious politition. Funnily polls showed great favor of Bush’s foreign policy during the beginning of the Iraq war and even when he was re-elected. Suddenly it has occured to Americans that he is just stupid and suddenly it is the conservitive republicans who look stupid and not the “liberal geeks”. It’s become something like a trend to be anti Bush. That leads me to the conclusion that it is not only Bush who has a very retarded and conservative thinking but the mass of US-Americans, too. I don’t want to say that this applies for all Americans but there is definitely a difference between Europeans and Americans concerning patriotism and nationalism.
Greets from Germany
October 13th, 2007 - 19:12
Whats wrong with America? The religious right. They have corupted the political landscape of America, voting in cruel and despotic men based on the fact that a couple of their core issues matter more than humanity to fellow man. They have polarised and poisioned the American system with there hate filled holier than thou attitudes. Without knowing the man, but having been brought up in Christian land I would have thought while abortion and gays may have taken up some of his thoughts, I am sure Jesus would have been far more concerned with a country would rather grease the palms of defence contractors than feed its poor or provide homes and education/healthcare. Jesus was a socialist with a small s. American’s, because they generally have no idea what socialiam is (nor do they have much idea what true capitalism looks like either) have made him some sort of rabid evangelical hate monger. A country that has produced great men and women that elects men like Bush & Cheney (twice oh dear) is very nearly morally and socially bankrupt. They play to their self interested groups have no vision for America (other than a fearful one) and have done nothing to improve the lives of its people. George Washington, Theodore Roosevelt, John Adams, FDR, Dwight et al woulld be turning in their graves at what their beloved country has become.
October 13th, 2007 - 22:09
no one died when clinton lied.
October 13th, 2007 - 22:10
Can anybody say SUCK?
October 17th, 2007 - 21:51
Impeach -
1. To make an accusation against.
2. To charge (a public official) with improper conduct in office before a proper tribuna
Negligent Homicide
Van Wagner & Wood, Criminal Defense Lawyers, Negligent Homicide Defense Attorneys
Negligent homicide is defined by Wisconsin law as a criminal offense that is committed by a person whose negligence is the direct cause of another person’s death. Negligence in law occurs when a person does not observe an obligation or duty where a legal obligation or duty exists or behaves in a manner lacking reasonable care. The law assumes that people will take a reasonable amount of care in all of their actions. Reasonable care is a degree of caution or care that a competent person in the same line of business, work, or activity should or is expected to exercise under similar circumstances. Negligence is then the lack of reasonable care and includes both actions with negligence and failure to act where a duty or obligation exists.
So you are saying that Bush caused the negligence that killed our soldiers in Iraq? That means that you would also need to bring charges against the commanding officers, the senators and reps who voted for this war and all the voters who elected said politicians. Soldiers sign up knowing that the possibility to go to was exist. They put themselves in harms way so you can sit at home a banter about how bad this war has made your life. Fabricate a real reason to impeach and I will listen. Ron Paul 2008
October 17th, 2007 - 22:15
Your publicly elected congressman voted for this war and gave the president the right to call for war against Iraq – Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq. The vote was 296 to 133 and 3 no votes including 81 dems. The senate passed it 77 to 23 including 29 dems. In wartime the president is given inherent authority to protect its citizens this right is given to the president in the Constitution(read below). So please think of some other excuse to impeach Bush.
“and the president, it bears noting, is the only governmental officer bound by our fundamental law “to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States” (Article II, Section 1). Nor does it mean the president is bound to honor congressional enactments (such as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)) to the extent their operation would constrain his inherent authority — a position supported historically by administrations of both parties because of the elementary proposition that a statute cannot trump the Constitution.”
Mr. Impeach -
Here’s one impeachable offense for you. Sorry it doesn’t involve a blow job. President Bush has admitted he secretly ordered the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on Americans without ever seeking constitutionally-required court approved warrants. Under the program — authorized in the weeks following the 9/11 attacks — the agency has monitored the international phone calls and e-mails of hundreds — and possibly thousands — of people inside the country. That’s not opinion. It’s fact. President Bush admitted it in his interview on PBS’ NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, December 16, 2005.
But I’m sure that’s not enough for you. I doubt anything would be. No matter what, you’d just call it a simple mistake and say no harm was meant. Well, ignorance is not a defense under the law, at least not for you or I it isn’t. Cheers.
Comment by Blue — September 28, 2007 @ 2:13 pm
November 2nd, 2007 - 07:14
Okay, Bush sucks as a president. We get it. Now can we just drop it already?